Tuesday, 21 April 2026
Historical Buildings Discovered in Beyşehir Lake

Historical Buildings Discovered in Beyşehir Lake

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Muharrem Çeken, Head of Excavation at Kubadabad Palace Complex, said “Beyşehir Lake and its surroundings have been the scene of settlements in the Chalcolithic, Bronze and Iron Ages since the Neolithic Age.”

Pointing out that some of these settlements were under water, Çeken said that “they added underwater research to the excavation works of the Kubadabad Palace Complex. Stating that the works started this year due to the low visibility under the water, Çeken said, "There have been settlements on the edge of the lakebed, in these water-drawn areas due to agricultural lands. In this process, we think that the remains on the coast of the Kubadabad Palace Complex, probably on the coast, were also built during these long-term withdrawals."

Çeken stated that the remains of these buildings continued along the coastline towards the north, and that there were structures connected with the remains of the large port on the Mındıras Peninsula, where the remains of the Hellenistic Period were found.

Çeken stated that the studies were carried out meticulously and said:

"Underwater archaeologists took various tile and ceramic samples from the area where the study was carried out. Work on the dating of these is ongoing. In addition, plans of the structures under the lake are being tried. What level is it, is it basic, is it at a higher level, is it mortarized, is it in some other way? As a result of these studies, these will be revealed. These structures are located in the east of the complex, about 100 meters inland from the water, at a depth of 1-1.5 meters. It stretches along the whole coast and goes as far as Mındıras, an area of about 3 kilometers. The structure we uncovered in 2020 is a structure that covers an area of 150-200 square meters. Next to it there is an adjacent structure covering an area of 100 square meters. We encounter these structures along the whole coast."

Çeken reported that he was of the opinion that the remains in question belonged especially to the Late Roman Age or the Early Byzantine period.